Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½Ç½À ¼ö¾÷¿¡¼­ ÀϺΠġ±â°ø°ú ÇлýµéÀÇ ºí·»µðµå ·¯´×°ú ÀüÅëÀûÀθé´ë¸é ¼ö¾÷ ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸

A comparison of blended learning and traditional face-to-face learning for some dental technology students in practice teaching

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2020³â 42±Ç 3È£ p.248 ~ 253
°­¿ù, ±èÀÓ¼±,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°­¿ù ( Kang Wol ) - Daegu Health College Department of Dental Laboratory
±èÀÓ¼± ( Kim Im-Sun ) - Daegu Health College Department of Dental Laboratory

Abstract


Purpose: This study aimed to verify whether blended learning is worth alternating with traditional face-to-face learning for some dental technology students in practice teaching.

Methods: A total of 68 students were included in this study. They were divided into two groups to compare blended learning and traditional face-to-face learning. The experiment had been carried out over 15 weeks. The following tests were performed: test of instructional quality, test of learning satisfaction, test of perceived usefulness, and test of learning flow. The IBM SPSS software was used to analyze the data.

Results: The learning satisfaction and the perceived useful of blended learning by students appeared to be higher than that of traditional face-to-face learning. However, there was no significant difference in the variables of traditional face-to-face learning and those of blended learning (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Blended learning is an alternative to traditional face-to-face learning for some dental technology students in practice teaching.

Å°¿öµå

Learning; Technology; dental

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI